8/15/2023 0 Comments Flood factor canadaThe prevalence of low resilience has been discussed among the general population and other disaster victims, and this prevalence may increase due to natural disasters. As much as resiliency involves coping, resilience can also affect profound personal growth and “bouncing back” from these difficult experiences. The definition of resilience is usually based on two key concepts: adversity and positive adaptation, which is defined as maintaining a healthy, asymptomatic lifestyle after stressful events. As research advances, attention is now drawn to individual resilience after a traumatic event. The ability to continue functioning after a traumatic event is usually a characteristic of successful adaptation and coping. In Canada, about 12.4 million people experience a disaster in their lifetime, and 73% of this population report a significant disruption to their work and home life. Hundreds to thousands of homes, businesses, and properties were destroyed, necessitating a large evacuation of residents in the affected vicinity.Įxposure to natural disasters is relatively common, and the individual who is exposed may battle mental health conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), substance use disorders, anxiety, and depression. The Fort McMurray 2020 flooding had a wide-range impact on residents. Natural disasters are large-scale events that are often unexpected and, among other things, cause trauma and the destruction of property. Further studies are needed to explore robust risk factors of low resilience and measures to promote normal to high resilience among flood victims in affected communities. After the flood, receiving support from the government was shown to be a protective factor. Factors contributing to low resilience include age, history of depression or anxiety, and place of residence after the flood. Conclusion: The study showed a low resilience rate among respondents following the 2020 flooding in Fort McMurray. Participants who received support from the Government of Alberta were less likely to express low resilience than those who received no or limited support (OR = 208.343 95% CI 3.284–13,218.663). Participants residing in the same house before the flood were almost 11 times more likely to show low resilience (OR = 0.095 95% CI 0.021–0.427) than those who relocated. Similarly, respondents willing to receive mental health counselling (OR = 0.134 95% CI: 0.047–0.378) were 7.5 times more likely to show low resilience. Responders with a history of depression (OR = 0.258 95% CI: 0.089–0.744) and a history of anxiety (OR = 0.212 CI 95% 0.068–0.661) were nearly four to five times more likely to show low resilience than those without a history. Respondents under 25 years were nearly 26 times more likely to show low resilience (OR = 0.038 95% CI 0.004–0.384) than respondents 40 years and above. Results: The prevalence of low resilience was 37.4%. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 25 using univariate analysis with the chi-squared test and binary logistic regression analysis. Method: Data collection was accomplished one year after the flood, from 24 April to 2 June 2021, using an online survey. Objective: This study explores the prevalence and associated factors between flood experience and low resilience a year after the 2020 floods in Fort McMurray. The flooding caused the loss of properties, evacuation of some residents, and effects on their mental health. In April 2020, parts of Fort McMurray were affected by severe floods. Background: Resilience after natural disasters is becoming an increasingly key area of research.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |